Renewable fuel Generator and Carbon neutral power gnerator working in tandem.

Clean Energy and Water Technologies Pty Ltd (CEWT) Carbon‑Negative Fuel Supply with CO₂ Buy‑Back Loop Bank‑Ready One‑Page Project Explanation 1. Project Overview This model separates power generation and carbon recycling into two contractually linked but independently bankable assets. CEWT supplies renewable methane as a fuel to a conventional 135 MW gas power plant, and contractually buys back the resulting CO₂ for conversion back into methane, closing the carbon loop. 2. Physical and Commercial Flow Renewable electricity is used by CEWT to generate hydrogen via electrolysis. Captured CO₂ is combined with hydrogen through methanation to produce renewable methane. This methane is sold under a long‑term fuel supply agreement to a 135 MW gas power plant. The power plant generates dispatchable electricity and produces CO₂, which is captured and transferred back to CEWT under a CO₂ buy‑back agreement. The CO₂ is recycled into further methane production. 3. What Is Being Sold Renewable methane as a physical fuel commodity. Dispatchable baseload electricity to the grid or industrial offtakers. CO₂ as a recyclable feedstock rather than a liability. 4. Carbon and Emissions Treatment The gas power plant operates in a conventional manner but with renewable methane as its fuel. All CO₂ generated is measured, captured, and contractually transferred back to CEWT for recycling. Net system emissions are zero to carbon‑negative, achieved through physical carbon recycling rather than offsets or credits. 5. Bankability and Risk Allocation This structure aligns with established infrastructure financing logic. Fuel supply agreements, power purchase agreements, and CO₂ handling contracts are familiar to lenders. The model avoids dependence on carbon credits or policy incentives. Technology risk is ring‑fenced within the CEWT carbon recycling entity, while power market risk remains with the generator. 6. Key Bank Takeaway “This is a conventional gas power project supplied with a renewable fuel, where carbon is continuously recycled rather than emitted. The business case relies on long‑term energy contracts and physical carbon management, not carbon credits.”

From Carbon Capture to Carbon Circulation

Why Splitting Fuel and Power Makes Net-Zero Work For more than a decade, the global energy transition has been framed as a choice between intermittent renewables and carbon capture. One promises clean energy but struggles with reliability; the other preserves reliability but is criticised for cost and complexity. Carbon Recycling Technology (CRT) starts from a different premise: carbon is not waste to be buried, but a recyclable carrier that can circulate continuously within the energy system. At Clean Energy and Water Technologies (CEWT), the most important step in making this idea commercially credible has been splitting fuel production and power generation into two distinct, conventional business units. Carbon is not the fuel. Energy is. In CRT, hydrogen produced from renewable electricity provides the energy, while carbon atoms act as a recyclable molecular carrier. Carbon dioxide is captured, converted into Renewable Synthetic Methane Gas (RSMG), used as fuel, captured again after combustion, and returned to the cycle. Two units. One closed carbon loop. The fuel production unit manufactures RSMG using renewable electricity and recycled carbon dioxide. It operates like a conventional fuel business, selling a pipeline-quality product under long-term contracts. The power generation unit is a standard 135 MW gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) plant. It purchases RSMG, generates dispatchable electricity, captures all CO2 produced, and transfers it back for reuse. Why separation matters. Separating fuel and power delivers commercial clarity, regulatory clarity, and financial robustness. Fuel is sold. Power is sold. Carbon is measured and recycled. Carbon-neutral by design. Carbon-negative by choice. The base configuration delivers carbon-neutral fuel and zero-emission electricity through physical carbon recycling. Carbon-negative outcomes are possible where additional CO2 is incorporated, but these are treated as optional upside. Designed for the real world. CRT integrates with existing gas infrastructure, turbines, and grids. It does not depend on offsets or fragile policy mechanisms. Founder’s note: Carbon Recycling Technology reflects a simple conviction: nature does not waste carbon—it cycles it. Aligning energy systems with this principle allows net-zero to scale. Ahilan Raman Founder & Managing Director, CEWT