CEWT invites investors and strategic Partnership.

Carbon Recycling Technology CRT integrates renewable electricity, hydrogen production, carbon recycling, and high-efficiency power generation into a closed-loop energy system. The process works as follows: 1. Renewable electricity produces hydrogen via electrolysis. 2. Hydrogen reacts with captured CO₂ in a methanation reactor. 3. The reaction produces renewable methane (RNG). 4. RNG fuels high-efficiency combined-cycle turbines. 5. The CO₂ produced is captured and recycled back into the system. This creates a circular carbon energy cycle. Carbon atoms circulate within the system rather than being emitted to the atmosphere. Demonstration Project CEWT is advancing a 135 MW Carbon Recycling Technology demonstration project in Australia. Key parameters Net dispatchable power output 135 MW Electrolyser capacity 274 MW Total estimated CAPEX A$1.624 billion Technology integration • Renewable hydrogen production • Methanation fuel synthesis • Gas turbine combined cycle generation • Closed carbon recycling loop The project is designed to demonstrate a scalable architecture for firm renewable energy. Strategic Importance CRT addresses several critical needs of the global energy transition. Reliable Renewable Power CRT converts intermittent renewable electricity into firm dispatchable generation. Carbon Neutral Fuel Cycles Carbon is continuously recycled, eliminating ongoing fossil carbon inputs. Infrastructure Compatibility CRT can leverage existing: • gas turbines • gas pipelines • LNG infrastructure • industrial fuel systems Industrial Decarbonisation CRT can support: • green iron and steel • desalination • chemicals • industrial heat • grid-scale energy storage Why This Matters Now Three major trends are accelerating the need for new energy system architectures: 1. Renewable energy expansion Large volumes of renewable electricity require reliable system balancing. 2. Industrial decarbonisation Heavy industries need carbon-neutral fuel solutions. 3. Energy security Countries are seeking alternatives to fossil fuel imports while maintaining reliable energy systems. CRT addresses all three simultaneously. Investment Opportunity CEWT is currently engaging with strategic investors, industrial partners, and infrastructure developers to support the deployment of Carbon Recycling Technology. Potential collaboration areas include: • project equity participation • strategic industrial partnerships • technology licensing • infrastructure investment The 135 MW demonstration project represents the first commercial-scale implementation of CRT. Contact Clean Energy and Water Technologies Pty Ltd (CEWT) Strategic partnership and investment enquiries welcome.

Clean Energy and Water Technologies Pty Ltd (CEWT) Carbon Cartridge Loop for LNG Prime Movers This concept proposes a closed carbon logistics loop for LNG‑fuelled long‑haul prime movers. Carbon dioxide emitted during vehicle operation is captured onboard and unloaded periodically at a service facility (“works”), and recycled into renewable methane using hydrogen produced from renewable electricity. In this architecture, carbon atoms circulate in a managed loop while renewable electricity provides the energy input. Methane (LNG) acts as the recyclable carrier molecule, enabling long‑range heavy transport without new fossil fuel inputs. Operating Principle 1. LNG is combusted in the vehicle, producing CO2 and water. 2. An onboard capture cartridge collects CO2 from the exhaust stream. 3. At approximately 200 km intervals, the cartridge is swapped at a works facility. 4. Captured CO2 is combined with renewable hydrogen in a methanation reactor. 5. The resulting methane is liquefied to renewable LNG and used to refuel vehicles. Example Energy Balance (Prime Mover – 200 km) Parameter (200 km Prime Mover Leg) Value LNG consumed ≈ 60 kg CO2 generated ≈ 165 kg Hydrogen required for recycling ≈ 30 kg Electrolyser electricity required ≈ 1.65 MWh Methane regenerated ≈ 60 kg Key Infrastructure Elements Vehicle • LNG prime mover engine • Exhaust CO2 capture cartridge • Cartridge swap interface Works Facility • Carbon cartridge receiving and handling system • CO2 conditioning and compression • Renewable electricity powered electrolyser • Methanation reactor system • LNG liquefaction and storage • LNG refuelling station Strategic Advantages • Utilises existing LNG heavy‑transport engine platforms • Converts CO2 from waste into fuel feedstock • Renewable electricity becomes the true energy input • Carbon atoms circulate as a reusable carrier molecule • Suitable for freight corridors, mining fleets and logistics hubs Clean Energy and Water Technologies Pty Ltd (CEWT) | ABN 61 691 320 028 | ACN 691 320 028

Carbon as the Carrier.

CEWT Foundation Series Carbon as the Carrier: Why Closed Carbon Loops Change the Energy Transition For decades, the energy transition has been framed as a simple substitution problem: replace fossil fuels with renewable electricity. However, industrial energy systems require more than electricity alone. They require storage, transportability, and high‑temperature energy for heavy industry. As a result, the global transition is gradually evolving toward a dual‑energy architecture: electrons and molecules. Renewable electricity delivers efficient, real‑time power. Molecular fuels provide energy storage, transport, and industrial heat. Among these molecular pathways, synthetic methane has emerged as a promising bridge between renewable electricity and the world’s existing gas infrastructure. Synthetic Methane as the Bridge Synthetic methane can be produced by combining renewable hydrogen with captured carbon dioxide. Because methane is already widely used across global energy infrastructure — including pipelines, LNG systems, turbines, and industrial furnaces — it provides a practical pathway to integrate renewable energy into existing systems without rebuilding the entire energy network. The Deeper Breakthrough: Closed Carbon Loops While synthetic methane helps bridge infrastructure, the real transformation occurs when methane operates within a closed carbon loop. In this system, carbon dioxide released during energy use is captured and reused to produce methane again. Carbon atoms circulate continuously through the system rather than being released permanently into the atmosphere. From Linear Carbon to Circular Carbon Traditional fossil energy follows a linear model: fossil carbon is extracted from underground, used as fuel, and released as CO₂ into the atmosphere. Closed carbon loops transform this linear pathway into a circular one. Renewable electricity produces hydrogen. Hydrogen reacts with recycled CO₂ to produce methane. When methane is used for energy, the resulting CO₂ is captured and returned to the cycle. In this architecture, carbon behaves as a reusable carrier of energy rather than a disposable fuel. Why Closed Carbon Loops Matter Closed carbon loops provide several strategic advantages. They eliminate the need for continuous fossil carbon extraction, allow existing gas infrastructure to remain useful, and enable renewable electricity to be stored and transported in molecular form. Most importantly, they support the energy needs of heavy industry, which often requires high‑temperature fuels and continuous operation. Electrons and Molecules The future energy system will likely rely on two complementary energy vectors. Electrons provide efficient renewable power for direct electrification. Molecules provide energy storage, transport, and industrial fuel. Closed carbon loops connect these two worlds by transforming renewable electricity into recyclable molecular energy carriers. Conclusion The energy transition is not simply about removing carbon from the system. It is about redefining the role carbon plays within it. In a closed carbon loop, carbon becomes a circulating carrier of renewable energy, enabling industrial systems to operate without introducing new fossil carbon into the atmosphere. By redesigning the carbon cycle of the industrial economy, closed carbon loop systems offer a pathway toward deep decarbonisation while maintaining the reliability and scale required by modern energy infrastructure. Clean Energy and Water Technologies Pty Ltd (CEWT) ABN 61 691 320 028

Inustrial resilience in a climate volatile future.

Industrial Resilience in a Climate-Volatile Future Re-thinking Brine & Salt Supply Architecture for Coastal Chemical Complexes Clean Energy and Water Technologies Pty Ltd (CEWT) EXECUTIVE CONTEXT India’s coastal chemical complexes operate under increasing climate volatility and water stress. Rainfall variability, cyclonic intensity, salinity dilution events, and land-use pressure are no longer peripheral risks — they are operational realities. Solar evaporation-based salt production, while low in direct energy input, is inherently: • Seasonal and climate-dependent • Extremely land-intensive • Exposed to weather variability • Dependent on annual harvest cycles For chlor-alkali facilities consuming hundreds of tonnes of brine daily, this creates a structural mismatch: Continuous industrial demand versus seasonal, weather-driven supply. STRATEGIC RISK EXPOSURE A once-a-year harvest model introduces: • Inventory concentration risk • Working capital lock-up • Production continuity exposure during extreme weather events • Increasing land footprint under environmental scrutiny Climate volatility amplifies these risks. Energy can be engineered. Land and rainfall cannot. ARCHITECTURAL ALTERNATIVE A controlled, continuous brine generation model aligned with industrial demand can: • Reduce land footprint significantly • Align production with daily consumption • Improve water security • Convert climatic variability into engineered reliability • Enable electrified, low-carbon integration pathways When integrated with firm renewable energy systems and circular water recovery, brine and process water systems can materially reduce carbon exposure while strengthening supply resilience. BOARD-LEVEL QUESTION In a carbon-constrained and climate-volatile decade, which architecture provides Greater long-term resilience? • Large-footprint, weather-dependent annual harvest systems or • Controlled, continuous, low-carbon brine production aligned with industrial load This is not a technology substitution question. It is a system risk and capital discipline decision. Aligning industrial infrastructure with emerging boundary conditions — climate variability, water scarcity, and net-zero commitments — will define competitive resilience in the decade ahead. © 2026 Clean Energy and Water Technologies Pty Ltd (CEWT) | ABN 61 691 320 028 | ACN 691 320 028

The System-Surrounding error in Carbon Accounting

The System–Surroundings Error in Carbon Accounting Clean Energy and Water Technologies Pty Ltd (CEWT) In carbon accounting, the boundary we draw defines the responsibility we accept. Under the GHG Protocol, organisations may consolidate emissions using equity share, financial control, or operational control approaches. All are technically valid. However, the atmosphere recognises none of these governance structures. It responds only to physics. When emissions move outside an organisational boundary—through outsourcing, joint ventures, or supply-chain restructuring—the reported footprint may shrink, but the physical concentration of greenhouse gases does not. This is the System–Surroundings Error in carbon accounting. It occurs when corporate reporting boundaries are optimised for compliance, while the broader thermodynamic system remains unchanged. Scope 1 appears pristine. Scope 2 improves through procurement. Yet material emissions accumulate in Scope 3, beyond direct control but not beyond systemic risk. As climate disclosure regimes such as ASRS elevate reporting to audit-grade status, the strategic question shifts: Are we defining boundaries for accounting clarity—or for risk accuracy? True climate governance requires alignment between financial reporting boundaries and physical system reality. Investors, regulators, and boards increasingly recognise that transition risk resides not only within controlled assets, but across value chains and energy architectures. Carbon accounting is not merely a numerical exercise. It is a boundary decision. And boundary decisions shape system outcomes. The next evolution of climate disclosure will not be about shrinking reported numbers. It will be about expanding accountability to match thermodynamic truth. © 2026 Clean Energy and Water Technologies Pty Ltd (CEWT) | ABN 61 691 320 028 | ACN 691 320 028