How Carbon Recycling technology (CRT) can reshape the oil and Gas landscape?

How Carbon Recycling Technology (CRT) Can Reshape the Oil & Gas Landscape For decades, the global energy debate has been framed around a single question: How do we get rid of fossil fuels? That framing may be the real problem. Oil and gas are not dominant merely because of lobbying or inertia. They dominate because they solved three hard problems better than any alternative: • energy density, • transportability, • and dispatchability at scale. The world didn’t choose fossil fuels because they emit CO₂. It chose them because they work. The overlooked question Instead of asking how to eliminate oil and gas, a more productive question is: Why aren’t we replacing fossil fuels with renewable fuels that behave the same way? This is where Carbon Recycling Technology (CRT) fundamentally changes the conversation. The mistake: treating carbon as the enemy Most decarbonisation strategies treat carbon itself as the problem. But carbon is not the issue — fossil carbon extraction is. Carbon is one of nature’s most effective energy carriers: • dense, • stable, • storable, • and compatible with global infrastructure. What’s unsustainable is introducing new fossil carbon into the system. CRT corrects this error by separating two roles: • Hydrogen is the fuel (energy source) • Carbon is the carrier (logistics medium) Renewable Synthetic Methane Gas (RSMG): a drop-in replacement CRT uses renewable electricity to produce hydrogen, then combines that hydrogen with captured CO₂ to produce renewable synthetic methane gas (RSMG). From a system perspective, RSMG: • behaves like LNG, • uses existing pipelines, storage, turbines, and engines, • provides dispatchable, long-duration energy, • but introduces no new carbon. When RSMG is used and the CO₂ is captured and recycled again, carbon becomes a closed-loop carrier, not an emission. Why the world isn’t focusing on this (yet) There are three main reasons: 1. Narrative inertia Energy discussions are dominated by binaries: renewables versus fossil fuels, electrons versus molecules. CRT doesn’t fit neatly into either camp. 2. Component thinking instead of system thinking Many solutions optimise one element — generation, storage, or efficiency — but ignore how energy must be carried across time, geography, and demand variability. 3. Misplaced focus on eliminating infrastructure Replacing global gas infrastructure is vastly harder than feeding it with a renewable fuel. CRT works with the system the world already has. What changes when CRT scales If CRT and RSMG are adopted at scale, the oil and gas sector doesn’t disappear — it transforms. • Gas infrastructure becomes a renewable energy network • LNG terminals become renewable fuel hubs • Gas turbines become zero-emission baseload assets • Carbon stops being waste and becomes a circulating carrier This is not incremental decarbonisation. It is a structural transition. The deeper shift The energy transition will not be won by removing complexity. It will be won by aligning with physical reality. Batteries buffer hours. Hydrogen upgrades energy. Carbon carries energy at scale. CRT brings these together into a coherent system — one that replaces fossil fuels without breaking the world that depends on them. The future of energy is not carbon-free. It is fossil-free. And that distinction matters.

Cabon recycling Technology as a system efficiency

Carbon Recycling Technology (CRT) as Systemic Efficiency Why Decarbonisation Fails Without System Boundaries — and How CRT Fixes It Most net-zero strategies fail for one simple reason: they confuse the system with its surroundings. The United Nations (UNECE, 2025) now frames decarbonisation not as a technology choice, but as a system-design problem — calling it systemic efficiency: reduce demand first, substitute clean energy second, and only then deal with residual emissions. This framing exposes the flaw in many popular pathways: • Electrification without 24/7 clean supply • CCS that shifts carbon elsewhere • Hydrogen without a closed carbon logic Carbon Recycling Technology (CRT) is built precisely around this missing boundary. CRT is not an offset. It is not CCS. It is not hydrogen hype. CRT is a closed-loop energy system: • Carbon stays inside the system as a recyclable carrier • Renewable hydrogen supplies the energy • Energy is extracted, carbon is recovered, and the loop is closed again No displacement. No accounting tricks. Zero emissions by design. Why this matters • Fuels still beat electrons for resilient, continuous baseload • Energy security comes from system design, not fuel geopolitics • Carbon is not the enemy — uncontrolled carbon is As the UN now recognises, efficiency, resilience, digitalisation, and circularity only work when the system boundary is explicit. CRT is a practical expression of that principle. Decarbonisation is not about eliminating carbon. It is about closing the carbon loop. Carbon as the carrier. Renewable hydrogen as the fuel. Systemic efficiency as the outcome.